Context
A résumé and job description become one interview profile.
AI implementation case study · Functional demo
PrepMe combines live conversation, structured interview evidence, rubric-based feedback, and targeted workshops. Each stage passes context into the next, helping candidates move from an interview answer to focused practice.
Self-directed demo of one complete HR-screen workflow. Use your own résumé and real job details, or explore the provided fictional sample.
System flow
A résumé and job description become one interview profile.
OpenAI Realtime runs the HR screen through voice or text.
The conversation becomes structured question-and-answer turns.
A grading task checks six explicit HR-screen signals.
Weak signals route to the matching interactive workshop.
Responsibility
Realtime conversation, rubric grading, feedback synthesis, and coaching suggestions.
Context assembly, transcript structure, task routing, state, validation, and workshop mapping.
The candidate controls the information they provide, whether to continue, and how they use the feedback. PrepMe does not make a hiring decision.
Implementation choices
Interviewing, transcription, grading, reporting, and coaching use a central task registry. The product can change one capability without scattering model choices across the application.
Grading and coaching responses are parsed and schema checked before the interface can use them. A malformed response fails cleanly instead of rendering a partial result.
Feedback carries source questions and answer excerpts into targeted workshops. Candidates can revisit the answer behind a weakness and practice the relevant skill.
Typed replies provide another way to participate. A completed fictional sample lets visitors explore feedback and workshops before committing to a live interview.
Demo session feedback and workshop completion persist in browser storage, so candidates can move between feedback and practice without losing their place.
Sessions with insufficient interview evidence bypass model grading and follow a defined practice path. The workflow distinguishes missing evidence from a substantive interview.